Delhi High Court questions maintainability of Sameer Wankhede’s defamation suit, see details
Delhi High Court questions maintainability of Sameer Wankhede’s defamation suit against Netflix and Red Chillies
New Delhi: Delhi High Court questions the maintainability of Sameer Wankhede’s defamation suit against Netflix and Red Chillies over “Bads of Bollywood.” Justice Kaurav in the case said, “Your plaint is not maintainable.”
According to reports, the Court noted Wankhede’s plaint lacks proper averments under Section 9 CPC (paras 37–38). Further it is worth mentioning that, the court allowed time for amendments but stated that the Registry will fix the next date.
Further the Court adjourned the hearing.
Former Mumbai zonal director at Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer Sameer Wankhede has filed a defamation suit before the Delhi High Court against Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt Ltd., the production house owned by Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan and his wife, Gauri Khan.
In his suit, Wankhede has sought relief in the nature of a permanent and mandatory injunction, declaration, and damages against the production house, Netflix and others, adding that he has been aggrieved by a false, malicious, and defamatory video in Aryan Khan’s directorial debut show, ‘The Ba***ds of Bollywood’.
“This series disseminates a misleading and negative portrayal of anti-drug enforcement agencies, thereby eroding public confidence in law enforcement institutions,” he claimed in his plea.
He also claimed that the series has been deliberately conceptualised and executed with the intent to malign Sameer Wankhede’s reputation in a colourable and prejudicial manner, particularly when proceedings involving him and Aryan Khan remain pending before the Bombay High Court and the NDPS Special Court, Mumbai.
He contended that the portrayal unfairly targets him at a time when the judicial scrutiny is ongoing.
Referring to a particular sequence in the show that featured a character making an obscene gesture after reciting ‘Satyamev Jayate’, the suit asserted that the act constitutes a grave and sensitive violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, which attracts penal consequences under the law.
In addition, the content of the series is in contravention of various provisions of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), as it seeks to outrage national sentiment through the use of obscene and offensive material.
In his lawsuit, Sameer Wankhede has sought damages of Rs 2 crore to be donated to the Tata Memorial Cancer Hospital for the treatment of cancer patients.
The suit also seeks the court’s direction to restrain the streaming and distribution of the show, along with a declaration of its defamatory nature. Wankhede has maintained that, beyond harming his personal reputation, the content undermines faith in institutions responsible for enforcing drug laws.
